Difference between revisions of "Leather alternatives"

From www.leather-dictionary.com - The Leather Dictionary
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "<p align=center> 300px </p> ==Research report from the research institute FILK on leather alternatives== In 2021, the research institute...")
 
Line 8: Line 8:
 
In 2021, the research institute [[FILK]] published a research report in which leather with possible leather alternatives was examined for their [[leather quality|technical properties]]. Title: „[https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6412/11/2/226 Comparison of the Technical Performance of Leather, Artificial Leather, and Trendy Alternatives]”.
 
In 2021, the research institute [[FILK]] published a research report in which leather with possible leather alternatives was examined for their [[leather quality|technical properties]]. Title: „[https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6412/11/2/226 Comparison of the Technical Performance of Leather, Artificial Leather, and Trendy Alternatives]”.
  
In this research work, a wide variety of leather alternatives were compared with the natural product [[leather]]. The product names or brands of the examined materials: [https://desserto.com.mx/home Desserto®], [https://youtu.be/GBhT2blZYwo Kombucha], [[Piñatex - Ananasleder|Pinatex®]], [https://noanifashion.de/ Noani]® (= no animal), [https://appleskin.com/ Appleskin]®, [https://www.vegeacompany.com/ Vegea]®, [https://www.snap-pap.de/ SnapPap]®, [https://leaf-family.com/ Teak Leaf]®, und [[Muskin - Trama|Muskin]]®.
+
In this research work, a wide variety of leather alternatives were compared with the natural product [[leather]]. The product names or brands of the examined materials: [https://desserto.com.mx/home Desserto®], [https://youtu.be/GBhT2blZYwo Kombucha], [[Piñatex - pineapple leather|Pinatex®]], [https://noanifashion.de/ Noani]® (= no animal), [https://appleskin.com/ Appleskin]®, [https://www.vegeacompany.com/ Vegea]®, [https://www.snap-pap.de/ SnapPap]®, [https://leaf-family.com/ Teak Leaf]®, und [[Muskin - MuSkin|Muskin]]®.
  
The materials examined consist of bio-substances and synthetic substances and aim to replace the [[tanning|tanned]] animal [[Hide Skin|skin]] with a vegan alternative. A [[Shoe leather|shoe upper leather]] competed against a [[synthetic leather]] and the leather alternatives listed above in this comparison of technical performance.
+
The materials examined consist of bio-substances and synthetic substances and aim to replace the [[tanning|tanned]] animal [[Hide - Skin|skin]] with a vegan alternative. A [[Shoe leather|shoe upper leather]] competed against a [[synthetic leather]] and the leather alternatives listed above in this comparison of technical performance.
  
 
The result: None of the leather alternatives examined could keep up with the [[leather quality|universal properties]] of [[genuine leather]]. Some materials achieved respectable results in individual test areas, but overall the performance of real leather was higher and is not matched by any alternative.
 
The result: None of the leather alternatives examined could keep up with the [[leather quality|universal properties]] of [[genuine leather]]. Some materials achieved respectable results in individual test areas, but overall the performance of real leather was higher and is not matched by any alternative.

Revision as of 19:40, 20 December 2022

LEATHER-DICTIONARY.jpg


Research report from the research institute FILK on leather alternatives

In 2021, the research institute FILK published a research report in which leather with possible leather alternatives was examined for their technical properties. Title: „Comparison of the Technical Performance of Leather, Artificial Leather, and Trendy Alternatives”.

In this research work, a wide variety of leather alternatives were compared with the natural product leather. The product names or brands of the examined materials: Desserto®, Kombucha, Pinatex®, Noani® (= no animal), Appleskin®, Vegea®, SnapPap®, Teak Leaf®, und Muskin®.

The materials examined consist of bio-substances and synthetic substances and aim to replace the tanned animal skin with a vegan alternative. A shoe upper leather competed against a synthetic leather and the leather alternatives listed above in this comparison of technical performance.

The result: None of the leather alternatives examined could keep up with the universal properties of genuine leather. Some materials achieved respectable results in individual test areas, but overall the performance of real leather was higher and is not matched by any alternative.


Additional information


Colourlock-GB-03.jpg

WE UNDERSTAND LEATHER - WWW.COLOURLOCK.COM